Re: [UPGRADE]: What's left?

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Ted Guild <> wrote:

> Especially given how a couple prominent examples are archives you may
> want to include an archivist perspective.  It is not just about the cost
> of editing all the content but the hesitation for a curator as a
> preservationist to do so.  I would be very reluctant for instance to
> modify historic content on that has been untouched for twenty
> years and predated https being a standard.

Noted in

> > Are there other barriers to migration that this doesn't address?
> Not that I'm aware of.  There is another colleague, Jose Kahan, I would
> like to consult, he is away at present and can hopefully respond next
> week.

Looking forward to additional feedback! :)

> > Exactly. The intent is to avoid the insecure content warning, and
> > that's how Chrome's experimental implementation works. Perhaps it's
> > worth adding a note about that to the document...
> We would be interested in trying out your experimental implementation
> against a test instance of our site.

Grab Canary, and
enable chrome://flags/#enable-experimental-web-platform-features. You
should start seeing the feature in action. I'd say it's 90% working at this
point. I'd be _very_ interested in additional feedback.


Received on Friday, 6 March 2015 15:22:51 UTC