- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2015 13:00:02 +0200
- To: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Cc: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, Dan Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > Actually, you know what: you're right. I forgot that we changed this > behavior as well: the report ought to contain the initially requested URL, > rather than the URL on which the request finally landed (see > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSP2/#violation-report-blocked-uri). I know Chrome > doesn't do this yet, but it ought to. I should also have listed it in the > breaking changes section of the spec. I'll add that now. Great, I think that means we maintain all invariants https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#atomic-http-redirect-handling cares about. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 2 July 2015 11:00:28 UTC