[powerful-features] Talking about the "incumbent settings object" of a document makes no sense

• From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
• Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 10:52:38 -0400
• To: public-webappsec@w3.org
• Message-ID: <5593FEB6.3000603@mit.edu>

https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/powerfulfeatures/#settings-secure 
step 2.2.2 talks about "ancestor’s incumbent settings object" where 
"ancestor" is a document.  But "incumbent settings object" is a property 
of the JS callstack, not of a document.

I assume that what you mean here is the "relevant settings object" of 
the document's global or something along those lines?  But mail coming 
up about how this whole part of the algorithm is not necessarily sensical...

-Boris

Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2015 14:53:08 UTC