- From: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:03:16 +0000
- To: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@mozilla.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAEeYn8h4c-7u1gAg5HiDukPkMTxvt7Pyv8oh56QumzCMWOLUVg@mail.gmail.com>
How do people feel about just using Hangouts? How important is PSTN connectivity for our participants? I know I usually dial-in PSTN today, but it would not be a hardship for me to use Hangouts. On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:56 PM Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > Meh, I take it back, I guess that would require spending something like > $10/person/month. > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:50 PM Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Wendy - was there a formal negative assessment of the accessibility of >> Hangouts? It seems to provide Captions, Keyboard Shortcuts and even the >> ability to invite a sign language interpreter. ( >> http://www.google.com/accessibility/all-products-features.html) >> >> Would folks be interested in seeing if we can make Hangouts plus the >> BlueJeans Hangouts integration (for PSTN+VoIP connectivity) happen for our >> group? (https://bluejeans.com/hangouts) >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:41 AM Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> wrote: >> >>> W3C's planned use of WebEx is purely as a replacement for the audio >>> features previously provided by the Zakim bridge (ISDN-POTS) -- you can >>> dial in or use a computer or mini-computer (mobile/tablet) to connect. >>> The features of the java client are unnecessary for our purposes. >>> >>> WebAppSec is free to experiment with other modes of interaction. so long >>> as we can meet accessibility considerations and cross-platform >>> availability. >>> >>> I look forward to webrtc's ubiquity! (and greater privacy-preservingness) >>> >>> --Wendy >>> >>> On 06/30/2015 07:22 AM, Mike West wrote: >>> > The WebEx client requires Java (at least according to >>> > https://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/InstallingWebEx); that's going to >>> make >>> > it pretty hard to run in Chrome. :/ >>> > >>> > -mike >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest >>> > >>> > Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, >>> > Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der >>> > Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth >>> > Flores >>> > (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. >>> Bleh.) >>> > >>> > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@mozilla.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I think WebEx has a video feature. At least they do in Spark. >>> >> >>> >> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Please note that this is the last call for which the zakim call-in >>> will >>> >>>> be available. The following calls will use a webex dial-in (or voip >>> >>>> connection). >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> If we're dropping Zakim in any event, I'd _very_ much appreciate >>> moving >>> >>> to something with a bit more F2Fness than a phone call. Video, for >>> >>> instance, would be exciting. Skype, Hangouts, Hello, etc. >>> >>> >>> >>> I haven't used WebEx in quite some time, but I vaguely remember it >>> >>> requiring a plugin (and not being awesome). It seems like the TAG has >>> >>> backed off using WebEx for their meetings, as well, which isn't a >>> positive >>> >>> sign. >>> >>> >>> >>> Is WebEx a done deal, or is there some wiggle-room for exploration? >>> >>> >>> >>> -mike >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Wendy Seltzer -- wseltzer@w3.org +1.617.715.4883 (office) >>> Policy Counsel and Domain Lead, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) >>> http://wendy.seltzer.org/ +1.617.863.0613 (mobile) >>> >>>
Received on Wednesday, 1 July 2015 00:03:52 UTC