- From: Deian Stefan <deian@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:39:34 -0800
- To: david kaye <dfkaye@yahoo.com>, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec\@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
david kaye <dfkaye@yahoo.com> writes:
> Thanks for responding.
>
> Given your example of the two files:
>
> // file1.js
> function doEval(str) {
> eval(str);
> }
>
> // file2.js
> doEval('alert("Hello, world!");');
>
>
> Assume that these files come from different URI domains:
>
> + //trusted.com/file1.js
> + //untrusted.evil/file2.js
>
> The 'eval-src' directive is just a whitelist of domains or paths, such that:
>
> + 'eval-src: //trusted.com; //another-trusted.com' ~ means js from those domains are ok to eval, so trusted.com/file1.js works.
> + //untrusted.evil ~ is not listed, so eval in file2 results in EvalError (think that's the type).
>
> Make sense?
I suspect that doing this in Gecko will also not be easy.
And I agree wth Mike: the semantics and trust model for this will get
very complicated.
What do you do about the reverse situation:
//untrusted.evil/file1.js
function f(str) {
eval('alert("w00t")')
}
//trusted.com/file1.js
f('3+4');
Best,
Deian
Received on Thursday, 29 January 2015 00:39:59 UTC