Re: [SRI] Getting sha-384 and sha-512 added to the RFC6920 registry?

The request is in, awaiting approval, I've already checked in async with
the expert and things are hakuna-matata.

On Thu Jan 08 2015 at 7:23:04 AM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> The registry is Expert Review, so I’d just go ahead an make the request;
> there’s nothing in it that’s tied to SRI specifically.
>
> If you need help, just yell.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> > On 8 Jan 2015, at 4:33 am, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > I have no idea. :) Adding mnot as our resident IETF wonk.
> >
> > -mike
> >
> > --
> > Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest
> >
> > Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany,
> Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft:
> Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores
> > (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails.
> Bleh.)
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Francois Marier <francois@mozilla.com>
> wrote:
> > We use RFC6920 URIs in the SRI spec to encode the hash algorithm and
> > value. That RFC created [1] a new registry [2] for the approved hash
> > algorithms.
> >
> > Since we intend to support sha-512 (and potentially sha-384 to match the
> > CSP spec [3]), should we get these algorithms added to the registry now?
> > Or is the right process to do that after we publish the SRI spec?
> >
> > Francois
> >
> > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6920#section-9.4
> > [2]
> > https://www.iana.org/assignments/named-information/
> named-information.xhtml#hash-alg
> > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSP2/#source-list-valid-hashes
> >
> >
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>
>
>