Re: CORS performance proposal from Martin Thomson on 2015-02-20 (public-webappsec@w3.org from February 2015)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:46:38 +1300
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnXF4j6ACFW6Wu9otz5VrqyCFY8hOsOKZ60XEd_uEEziKw@mail.gmail.com>

On 20 February 2015 at 11:39, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:
> The proposal is to use `OPTIONS * HTTP/1.1` not `OPTIONS /x HTTP/1.1`.

I missed that.  In which case I'd point out that `OPTIONS *` is very
poorly supported.  Some people (myself included) want it to die a
flaming death.

Received on Friday, 20 February 2015 01:47:05 UTC