- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:13:31 +0100
- To: David Ross <drx@google.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
* David Ross wrote: >That being said, I think the criticism is a bit unfair. EPR is an opt-in >feature with an intended audience largely separate from those who might >wish to prevent deep linking on their web sites. I don't see any reason to >believe that we will see excessive and inconsiderate application of EPR >leading to linkability issues on the web at large. If a publisher is >determined to prevent deep linking there are plenty of ways for them to do >that today, whether they choose to make use of the web platform or not. If "EPR" is redundant with existing features, why is it being proposed? -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de D-10243 Berlin · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de Available for hire in Berlin (early 2015) · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Friday, 13 February 2015 01:14:06 UTC