- From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:07:55 +0100
- To: Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Dan Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Forking this bit too, and dropping people from CC who aren't Brad, Wendy, or Dan. On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:07 PM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > There is some of this in the introduction, but I think for FPWD it is > important to be very clear about goals for an initial community review - > especially since this is new work not explicitly listed in our proposed > charter. >From a process perspective, do we need to explicitly list every deliverable in the charter? If we come up with something new in the future that's covered by the charter's scope (https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/admin/webappsec-charter-2015.html#scope), do we need to recharter in order to work on it? I prefer to work on smaller, more focused documents, as I have the vague impression that it increases clarity. A rechartering requirement would make it much more appealing to just jam everything into MIX or CSP. :/ -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 14:08:43 UTC