- From: Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:49:29 -0800
- To: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
- Cc: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Peter Eckersley <pde@eff.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>, "Eduardo' Vela" <evn@google.com>, Wendy Seltzer <wseltzer@w3.org>, Adam Langley <agl@google.com>, WebAppSec WG <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > Just FYI, that the websec WG in the IETF is basically in the process of > being decommissioned, so getting a standards-track RFC number for an updated > HSTS draft isn't likely to be a quick exercise. And that is a good thing. Standards should standardize existing known-to-work practice, not be untried designs (by committee). I suggest: document any HSTS extensions in Internet-Draft form; get 2 open source implementations, try it out for a while and see if it works and if people really want it; and then optionally RFC-ify later.
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 21:49:56 UTC