On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 February 2015 at 21:24, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote: > > My justification for allowing IPv4 is not IoT in itself, but the fact > that > > IPv4 is being used today, by the > > internet-of-things-that-happen-to-be-webservers-in-datacenters. > > Can you explain how those iotthtbwid devices might benefit from CSP? > I don't want to be obtuse, but I'm not seeing a case there. > I'm just thinking of normal websites that load data from servers via IP addresses rather than named hosts. I don't think that's something we particularly want to encourage, but neither is it something that I'd be surprised to see substantial numbers of sites doing today. -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, @mikewest Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 07:30:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:10 UTC