On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Austin William Wright <aaa@bzfx.net> wrote: > That's because this isn't a URL, it's a URI (at least not without an > authority component). As such, it's completely opaque to Web browsers. That distinction has been meaningless since forever. > While `integrity` isn't limited to HTML, there's plenty of precedent for > using URIs outside use as network identifiers in HTML, namely the `rel` and > `xmlns` attributes, and the `profile` media type property. These are all terrible precedents that we don't want to follow. > In any event, Web browsers shouldn't need to care, the syntax is arbitrary > to them. As I explained the more complicated processing model is not at all something arbitrary that can be ignored. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Friday, 24 April 2015 00:31:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:12 UTC