W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > April 2015

Re: April 20 Teleconference CANCELED

From: Joel Weinberger <jww@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:49:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CAHQV2KnQK3uO9bdo9qdCrqSnB2a4uU=S5ZN05pk60OrhZcamow@mail.gmail.com>
To: Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>
Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
I agree with SRI as well.
--Joel

On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:35 AM Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 to SRI.
>
> On 20 April 2015 at 00:30, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
>> SRI seems like a fair choice. A lot of things have been moving lately
>> and I recently published a new revision of the working draft on
>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/SRI/>.
>>
>> I planned to get a CfC for SRI to get to Last Call before that, but will
>> update the list in separate email shortly.
>>
>> On 20.04.2015 09:19, Mike West wrote:
>> > I'd vote for SRI, but if folks want to chat about Credentials, I'm game.
>> >
>> > -mike
>> >
>> > --
>> > Mike West <mkwst@google.com <mailto:mkwst@google.com>>, @mikewest
>> >
>> > Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München,
>> > Germany, Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891, Sitz der
>> > Gesellschaft: Hamburg, Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth
>> > Flores
>> > (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails.
>> Bleh.)
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com
>> > <mailto:dveditz@mozilla.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Tomorrow's teleconference (April 20) is canceled, we'll pick up
>> >     again in two weeks on Star Wars Day (May 4th).
>> >
>> >     We recently agreed to restructure the calls to focus each call on
>> >     particular specs designated in advance. For the May 4th call we need
>> >     a volunteer to go first with the new format. Any takers?  SRI has
>> >     been seeing some github action lately, and if the dust has settled
>> >     by then the Credentials spec has gone through some changes. Or we
>> >     could go with a spec that's been a bit quiet lately and make sure we
>> >     know where we are and what the next steps are.
>> >
>> >     -Dan Veditz
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 20 April 2015 15:49:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:12 UTC