- From: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 09:20:47 -0000
- To: "'Anne van Kesteren'" <annevk@annevk.nl>, "'Brad Hill'" <hillbrad@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Mike West'" <mkwst@google.com>, "'WebAppSec WG'" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Has there been any consideration for UA settings being able to make the CSP more restrictive? Like using the presence of a DNT header or an opt-in cookie? Something like script-src adco.fr[dnt:0] scriptlib.com; adco.fr only gets allowed if DNT:0 is present. Or for an opt-in cookie: script-src adco.fr[cookie:consent=yes] scriptlib.com; Mike O'Neill > -----Original Message----- > From: annevankesteren@gmail.com [mailto:annevankesteren@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren > Sent: 31 October 2014 08:35 > To: Brad Hill > Cc: Mike West; WebAppSec WG > Subject: Re: [MIX] 4.5 User Controls > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > > I don't want users to be socially engineered into attacking > > themselves, either, but we respect the priority of constituencies. In > > the end, it is the user's agent, not the resource's. UAs can make > > choices to warn users or make it difficult to do harm to themselves, > > and some might not provide any affordances around CSP, but I don't > > think it's appropriate to add normative text forbidding the user to > > modify CSP. > > I guess that's fair. But then I think I stand by my request to make it > clear in MIX that not all blocked fetches are equal and that you > probably don't want to use the same UI to cater to e.g. CSP and MIX. > Or MIX could simply not say anything about user control either... > > > -- > https://annevankesteren.nl/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (MingW32) Comment: Using gpg4o v3.3.26.5094 - http://www.gpg4o.com/ Charset: utf-8 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUU1RvAAoJEHMxUy4uXm2JiJoH/2SvDAlZ2LOiVXwsxeANxeOV PqplSOSp+2vPDx0eGsiZLnMLCLbhLHVaj8b4HTzvQiKL1v31HTVi/ybiEY/DOta9 o/r7GX9eqoUT3vH4W4h3b2CFGdVP8KTSTUa0Xd9pHXUs13zfUGElHXcR1G/UQpJC KY3d3ygJ13/Usn1dSeJ6ik+C6SNlTUlCTjst2YgNxEiNJYgREuymbABlp4kQ34yO tSWUBWounprP1JSwM6VSb7YTMCkBLs6xgJlc2pl26344iWadBNzEzXhkdN+VdZh2 Ff5m0v7GXNfYHNh7RvmOBYv1d7FOF739QKlOFz+X+K+rLUbJcpL+yluNl29MI94= =9uxZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Friday, 31 October 2014 09:21:39 UTC