- From: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:57:26 +0200
- To: Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Cc: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKXHy=d0rbYb6VWgTqfhSdPz7=PQ=dJmGrY0UXY4sthQ6i1Gtg@mail.gmail.com>
+Adam, FYI +1 -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com> Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 4:36 AM, Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > On Oct 20, 2014 4:15 PM, "Brad Hill" <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote: > >> WebAppSec members, >> >> We are on the verge of advancing Content Security Policy Level 2 to >> Candidate Recommendation, at which point it will be at the same >> maturity level as CSP 1.0. >> >> Whereas: >> >> 1) the incompatible differences are small and implementer intent seems >> to be to apply Level 2 behavior exclusively going forward... >> >> 2) we already lack for resources in test suite development and it is >> unlikely we will build distinct 1.0 and Level 2 test suites as would >> be necessary to advance both reports, or to complete the 1.0 test >> suite before 1.0-specific behaviors become deprecated by user >> agents... >> >> I believe that we should formally abandon the intent to further >> advance 1.0 and transition its status to "Working Group Note" >> (http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#Note) upon advancement of >> Level 2 to CR. Whereafter we would concentrate our efforts on >> advancing, evangelizing and testing CSP Level 2 towards full >> Recommendation status. >> >> This Call for Consensus will conclude during our Monday session at >> TPAC, October 27th. >> >> Comments welcome, positive feedback encouraged, absence of comments >> will be considered assent. >> >> thank you, >> >> Brad Hill >> >>
Received on Tuesday, 21 October 2014 06:58:15 UTC