Re: [power] simplify 2.1

I've taken a stab at this in
https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/commit/58921e0254b0f46e1d0ac53a6fa84afe14397d0c.
You can read the result more easily at
https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/powerfulfeatures/#terms.

Thanks for the feedback! I hope things are clearer now.

-mike

--
Mike West <mkwst@google.com>
Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91

Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores
(Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:06 PM, <chaals@yandex-team.ru> wrote:

> At the moment the "definition" of sufficiently secure provides a random
> selection of detail from section 4. It only needs to say
>
> "A Document or environment settings object is considered sufficiently
> secure to use powerful features if the algorithms defined in §4 return
> Sufficiently Secure when executed upon it."
>
> If you want to add informative explanation here, you could make the prose
> more human-friendly - section 4 gives the gory details.
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>
>