Re: CfC: Publish a FPWD of "Requirements for Powerful Features"

Hi Chaals,

On 11/25/2014 06:54 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
> TL;DR: Please go ahead.
> 24.11.2014, 23:20, "Mike West" <mkwst@google.com>:
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 9:00 PM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com
>> <mailto:hillbrad@fb.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     I've made a pull request to formalize the tone a bit.  Pending that or
>>     similar updates by the editor, I support the publication of this
>>     draft.
>>
>> Thank you! I accepted the pull, cleaned up a few bits, and
>> republished: http://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/powerfulfeatures/
> It is really helpful in a call for consensus to have a URL to a
> snapshot.

FWIW, you can review the commits made, individually if you so desire, by 
going to https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/commits/master

> Consensus to publish "whatever was there when I looked" is
> actually seriously weakened if you can change what is there (this is
> security 101, right?).

One thing that might improve the process is even for the spec editors to 
work in branches and issue Git pull requests back to master. The pull 
requests can be reviewed as a whole, or by looking at individual 
commits, prior to the reviewed pull request being merged to master.

- johnk

> That said, I think the changes I saw (up until about 15 minutes before I
> sent this mail) were helpful, and support publishing either way.
>> <http://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/powerfulfeatures/><http://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/powerfulfeatures/>
>> Regarding the issue #2 you added, 'blob:' has an origin, as does
>> 'data:'. What clarification do you think is necessary in the algorithm
>> in order to resolve the issue?
> cheers
> Chaals
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2014 15:14:05 UTC