Re: "Requirements for Powerful Features" strawman.

Sorry - I need to take some time and read it through, but quickly, is this
a normative document as extracted?  Can we write test cases and
demonstrate conformance?

On 11/20/14, 11:16 AM, "Chris Palmer" <> wrote:

>On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Mike West <> wrote:
>> Seems clearly covered by "features which require a verifiably secure
>> environment".
>> I'd prefer doing it here, but I'm easy. If folks think the TAG should
>> publish, I'm sure they'll be happy to do so.
>I'm fine with publishing it wherever and however, but I do think it
>should be a separate document.

Received on Thursday, 20 November 2014 19:41:21 UTC