- From: Ian Melven <ian.melven@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 14:01:46 -0800
- To: Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 22:02:12 UTC
i agree with your assessment of the positive value of Last Call and would support maintaining it informally ian On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@fb.com> wrote: > The W3C has a new, more streamlined process for Recommendation Track > documents: > > http://www.w3.org/2014/Process-20140801/#Reports > > There is no longer an explicit "Last Call" stage required. > > With my hat on as chair, I feel that Last Call is a useful phase of the > process. Our group works asynchronously, our features have impact on > features defined by other WGs, and historically a Last Call announcement > has been very fruitful for us in terms of receiving input from the broader > community. It is a signal to someone with limited time to devote to review > that new features are not planned and things are approaching their final > shape. > > What do other members (and especially editors think)? Should we abandon > the Last Call in WebAppSec, or maintain it informally as part of our > group's culture? > > Thanks, > Brad Hill >
Received on Monday, 10 November 2014 22:02:12 UTC