Re: [SRI] may only be used in documents in secure origins

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 5:29 AM, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org> wrote:
> But, unless/until somebody actually does that experiment, for "don't break
> the web" reasons alone, it makes sense to say that SRI MUST NOT be enforced
> only for non-HTTPS documents or non-HTTPS subresources.

To be clear, this is different from what Chrome does today. Per OP,
Chrome Canary blocks.


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2014 08:45:56 UTC