Re: Naming things: CSP 1.1 -> CSP level 2? from Glenn Adams on 2014-06-24 (public-webappsec@w3.org from June 2014)

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:46:20 -0600
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, "Hill, Brad" <bhill@paypal.com>, Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, "Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla. com>" <dveditz@mozilla.com>
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+eTXBobZb4vwj9zNjar-R1SGcE-t=YqjYM0jDDuo5bqpQ@mail.gmail.com>

XHR redux


On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com> wrote:
> > You think we should abandon the advancement of Level 1 and just focus on
> > Level 2?
>
> Yeah, when you make breaking changes you either need to change Level 1
> to be compatible again (e.g. CSS Level 2 had a revision 1) or just
> abandon it (happened to CSS Level 1, although that was never made
> official).
>
>
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:47:11 UTC