Re: Naming things: CSP 1.1 -> CSP level 2?

You think we should abandon the advancement of Level 1 and just focus on
Level 2?


On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Hill, Brad <bhill@paypal.com> wrote:
> > I do expect this will put a little more pressure than there already is
> from the director / director's designee to advance Level 1 all the way to
> REC before it gets passed by Level 2.  The only thing really holding that
> up right now is the test suite, which I'm trying to make progress on, but
> could definitely use some other volunteers.
>
> If you are making breaking changes in Level 2, testing the
> requirements of Level 1 is counter-productive.
>
>
> --
> http://annevankesteren.nl/
>

Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2014 16:33:46 UTC