On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Tanvi Vyas <tanvi@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 6/9/14 9:50 PM, Mike West wrote:
>
>>
>> I'd prefer to maintain the ability to tighten a page's policy, as I think
>> there are totally valid use cases for such a thing, but so far I've been
>> the only one in favor of that, and the spec reflects my understanding of
>> the group's consensus.
>>
>
> I don't see any problem with using a meta policy to tighten (and not
> loosen) a header policy. Perhaps we can revisit this discussion.
>
This also sounds reasonable to me, and seems like it would be pretty useful
in the case of many types of setup where the host might want to provide a
base policy but allow users to add additional user-defined security
policies (e.g. wordpress, github). I'm actually surprised you were the
only one in favour given that this seems particularly useful in a lot of
the same situations where the meta tag would be useful in the first place.
Terri