W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > July 2014

Re: [MIX]: Can we distinguish between images loader via `<picture>`/`srcset` and `<img>`?

From: Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws>
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 21:21:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CACj=BEhsq=TE6LVWAnEmLrhJ9_Gij3C22kEjAjFmGD9Nih=WBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Tab Atkins <tabatkins@google.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>
I've talked to Simon Pieters on IRC (while he's vacationing), and he's fine
with this change, but would prefer that such mixed content blocking would
be integrated into the processing model.
I guess that he'd talk about it with further details once he's back.

On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Yoav Weiss <yoav@yoav.ws> wrote:

> We've discussed this over a GH issue
> <https://github.com/ResponsiveImagesCG/picture-element/issues/229>, and
> the RICG is fine with this change.
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 5:45 PM, Mike West <mkwst@google.com> wrote:
>> > Does a ServiceWorker have any need to override the page's/UA's
>> selection of
>> > image source? If so, perhaps "ResponsiveImage" and "Image" make sense as
>> > separate contexts. The former might need additional flags.
>> Would we trigger it from image-set or image() in CSS or whatever that
>> is these days as well then?
> Does anyone have usage stats for image-set/image() ?
>> Also, context has no room for flags at the
>> moment. If we should make room for that it would be good to know now.
>> --
>> http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 2 July 2014 19:22:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:06 UTC