I think bringing the PSL in here sincerely overcomplicates the way developers have to understand the syntax. I'm perfectly happy with trusting developers to understand that setting `*.com` is a bad idea. -mike -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com> Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com> > wrote: > > Given that all other technologies set a barrier, I don't think CSP > > should deviate. > > But we (obviously) allow * to match beyond public-suffixes which I find > > notable. > > Do we really want to expand the set of things PSL covers? Not a fan. > What does that even mean here? If you have *.uk, {anything}.co.uk > would not match? > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > >Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2014 09:06:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:39 UTC