Re: Removal of the note about extensions

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Mike "Pomax" Kamermans <> wrote:

> On 2/25/2014 2:39 AM, Mike West wrote:
>> Though I'd claim that "encourage" actually is more reflective of the WG's
>> consensus, I'm mostly fine with Mike's phrasing as a compromise (with some
>> slight tweaking: I'd replace "CSP enforcement" with "the enforcement of a
>> protected resource's Content Security Policy").
> Cool. I'd strongly prefer "encourage", too, but I'd even more prefer a
> non-abscent text =)

I've added a slightly tweaked version of this as
Feedback is welcome.

> Not being familiar with the actual code-contribution process, who would be
> filing this as  PR?

If you (or anyone else!) wants to directly suggest changes to the spec,
then forking and submitting a pull request
is certainly acceptable.



Mike West <>
Google+:, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91

Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores
(Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.)

Received on Thursday, 27 February 2014 13:13:57 UTC