- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 14:40:11 +0100
- To: Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
* Brad Hill wrote: >Since we all agree about the PoC, but could argue for another few months >about what exactly it means, would everyone be able to live with the >following text: > >"When considering interactions between a resource's policy and >user-initiated changes to that resource, for example through extension >mechanisms or bookmarklets, user agent implementors SHOULD take in to >account the HTML5 Priority of Constituencies (link) when determining >whether to enforce or report on a policy violation that would be generated >by such changes." That is not acceptable, starting with the fact that the document in question is a Working Draft that has not been updated since 2007 and there would be problems making normative reference to a Working Draft that is not likely to advance and does not have technical requirements. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 13:40:37 UTC