- From: Stefan Ossendorf <stefan.ossendorf@outlook.de>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 20:46:04 +0200
- To: "'Mike West'" <mkwst@google.com>
- CC: <public-webappsec@w3.org>, "'Devdatta Akhawe'" <dev.akhawe@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <DUB113-DS209D0E05BE7526ADD59CCAE2EA0@phx.gbl>
Hi Mike, sadly the grammar is still wrong L. Now I can chain sandbox-tokens without the separating whitespaces. My suggestions are: 1. Explicit ABNF: *WSP / sandbox-token *( 1*WSP sandbox-token) Or ABNF: “” / sandbox-token *( 1*WSP sandbox-token) I’m not sure if “” count as empty 2. Implicit ABNF: *( 1*WSP sandbox-token ) Or ABNF: *( sandbox-token 1*WSP ) -Stefan Ps: Np ;-) Germany is nice ;) Von: Mike West [mailto:mkwst@google.com] Gesendet: Montag, 11. August 2014 22:17 An: Devdatta Akhawe Cc: Stefan Ossendorf; public-webappsec@w3.org Betreff: Re: [CSP] feedback sandbox ABNF grammar conflict The grammar is no longer wrong (I hope... ABNF is not my strong suit): https://github.com/w3c/webappsec/commit/0822e8bafa7f53adb1c546864abfae79e2ee05f2 Thanks for the report, Stefan! -mike -- Mike West <mkwst@google.com> Google+: https://mkw.st/+, Twitter: @mikewest, Cell: +49 162 10 255 91 Google Germany GmbH, Dienerstrasse 12, 80331 München, Germany Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Geschäftsführer: Graham Law, Christine Elizabeth Flores (Sorry; I'm legally required to add this exciting detail to emails. Bleh.) On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Devdatta Akhawe <dev.akhawe@gmail.com> wrote: I believe the grammar is wrong and the empty token list is fine. See also http://developers.whatwg.org/the-iframe-element.html#attr-iframe-sandbox =Dev On 10 August 2014 13:04, Stefan Ossendorf <stefan.ossendorf@outlook.de> wrote: > Hello, > > > > I’m trying to implement the CSP Spec from > (https://w3c.github.io/webappsec/specs/content-security-policy/#directive-sandbox). > > But the ABNF of sandbox is not clear. > > Quote: > > directive-name = "sandbox" > > directive-value = sandbox-token *( 1*WSP sandbox-token ) > > sandbox-token = <token from RFC 7230> > > > > But the first example under „Usage“ say it’s possible to create an empty > sandbox directive without any value. The ABNF says but at least one token > and a token can’t be empty according to the token spec. > > What’s correct? > > > > Thanks in advance > > Stefan Ossendorf
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2014 18:46:27 UTC