On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote: > * Brad Hill wrote: > >We can always remove non-normative text at any point, provided there is > >consensus. We can continue to work towards consensus on whether to keep > >the current non-normative language in Section 3.3, but that approach does > >not necessitate any changes to this poll, which is only about closing the > >spec to new features, requirements and normative behavior. > > The text in question is a normative requirement. Doing otherwise has > a potential for causing harm and so it has to be a requirement, too. > It is a normative recommendation (SHOULD NOT), not a normative requirement (SHALL NOT). > -- > Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de > Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de > 25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ > >
Received on Saturday, 5 October 2013 17:11:20 UTC