W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > November 2013

Re: ACTION-146, propose spec text for Workers

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:32:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CADnb78hSUww24qdtpDCk1ozP1Zgw-E3gnDkWo290LWomADBQPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> Why? You can easily define a blob:'s origin as being the origin registered
> for that blob: URL. It's just a lookup. You could even encode the origin
> directly into the URL (either opaquely or not), so that it wouldn't need
> to be expensive to look up.

That's an interesting model, but doesn't match the one written down:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6454#section-4

In addition, I'm not sure we want blob URLs to have an associated
origin. I think they should always be same-origin if you are holding
one.


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 25 November 2013 11:32:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:03 UTC