Re: ACTION-146, propose spec text for Workers

On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote:
> > Were blob: urls specifically rejected, or just not considered? If 
> > rejected, why?
> 
> Blob URLs for SharedWorker might not have been considered. Ian, do you 
> know?

Any URL that has the same origin as the incumbent settings object when the 
worker is created should work fine. I don't know what defines the origin 
of blob: URLs, but if they're same-origin URLs, they should work fine, per 
the worker spec.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 18:49:35 UTC