W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > November 2013

Re: ACTION-146, propose spec text for Workers

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:49:12 +0000 (UTC)
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
cc: Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>, Brad Hill <hillbrad@gmail.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1311201844310.27139@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote:
> > Were blob: urls specifically rejected, or just not considered? If 
> > rejected, why?
> 
> Blob URLs for SharedWorker might not have been considered. Ian, do you 
> know?

Any URL that has the same origin as the incumbent settings object when the 
worker is created should work fine. I don't know what defines the origin 
of blob: URLs, but if they're same-origin URLs, they should work fine, per 
the worker spec.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2013 18:49:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 23 October 2017 14:54:03 UTC