W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webappsec@w3.org > May 2013

Re: [filter-effects][css-masking] Move security model for resources to CSP

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 12:27:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBRZkC-=mAa+2LoQsCtaqp2fsRd4mLntmC72t7iJ2-YYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, Philip Rogers <pdr@google.com>
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
> On Apr 10, 2013, at 2:18 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
>> If we accept the need for a sandbox domain, same-origin loads becomes
>> an option I think. And actually, even in the face of an open redirect
>> you could fail flat the moment the target URL becomes cross-origin and
>> not fetch it. Several APIs on the platform have a request mode of
>> same-origin  (different from tainted cross-origin, which will fetch)
>> with an opt in availability for CORS.
>> So we need to turn all kinds of external loads into CORS same-origin loads?
>> That sounds like it would work, but be quite invasive to spec and implement.
> To recapitulate:
> This threat currently focuses on SVGs as image resources and if there are ways to let an SVG image load further resources. An initial test for <img> and CSS Images actually shows that Firefox and Chrome block any external resources of an SVG image right away - independent if the resource has the same origin or not. The bug reports on Chrome [1] and Firefox [2] and this thread actually confirm that.
> Maybe CSS and SVG should specify exactly that: No load of any external resources of an SVG file loaded as image. Exclusions of the restrictions can be specified later after more investigations.
> Is that something we can agree initially?

I'm happy with whatever roc and Anne are happy with.  ^_^

Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2013 19:28:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:33 UTC