Re: ISSUE-32: Do we specify that path-specificity applies only to hierarchical URI schemes? from Adam Barth on 2013-02-12 (public-webappsec@w3.org from February 2013)

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:30:18 -0800
To: Web Application Security Working Group <public-webappsec@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAJE5ia8Mw=eHRKveDprhjLLoboa1-vk1iCofqnVPJmRVDJxfNA@mail.gmail.com>

The way we handled this in rfc6454 was using the following text:

"If the URI does not use a hierarchical element as a naming authority
(see [RFC3986], Section 3.2) ..."

That references https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.2, which
is a definition that folks seemed to be happy with.  We might want to
reference that same concept as well so that it's consistent with the
web origin concept.

Adam

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Web Application Security Working Group
Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
> ISSUE-32: Do we specify that path-specificity applies only to hierarchical URI schemes?
>
> http://www.w3.org/2011/webappsec/track/issues/32
>
> Raised by:
> On product:
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 February 2013 22:31:18 UTC