Re: CORS and 304

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Jonas Sicking <> wrote:
> So you mean that if a CGI does a 304 redirect and sends some response
> headers and a response body, then apache will filter out the headers but
> send the 304 and the body? Is this specific to 304s?

304 is not strictly a redirect. 304 is "Not Modified". An indication
from the server that you can use the cached copy.

> Either way, a security issue can't be ignored because servers suck. We
> should still require the headers to be sent. Authors can always use other
> 30x responses.

Not for these semantics.

Mark, Julian, do you think CORS headers should be required on a 304 response?


Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 12:16:04 UTC