- From: Frederik Braun <fbraun@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:48:06 +0200
- To: public-webappsec@w3.org
On 06.04.2013 08:14, Yoav Weiss wrote: > Personally, I believe it would be easier for authors if the directive is > `img-src` (rather than `media-src`) > The directive media-src is currently used for audio and video. This implies that a resource within that directive has always the capability to sound. img-src on the other hand is currently just for the display of non-moving pictures. Makes sense to put it in img-src then. > Do you guys have a preference in the matter? > I'm not really active in the group. Just a mailing list lurker :)
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 10:09:51 UTC