- From: Erlend Oftedal <eoftedal@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:45:45 -0700
- To: Odin Hørthe Omdal <odinho@opera.com>, "public-webappsec@w3.org" <public-webappsec@w3.org>
That's the plan. Need to look into the testharness.js framework and see how they can be adapted. Do you have any test examples? Best regards, Erlend From: Odin Hørthe Omdal Sent: 10.09.2012 11:56 To: public-webappsec@w3.org Subject: Re: CSP 1.0 browser compliance testing On Fri, 07 Sep 2012 19:41:16 +0200, Erlend Oftedal <erlend@oftedal.no> wrote: > Contributions in terms of new tests and QA of the existing ones are > highly appreciated (other contributions as well of course). See below > if you are interested. Hi, this is very cool, Erlend! The web needs more tests! I'm wondering about the license on your tests? It would be highly beneficial to get this into the w3c test system, so that it can run on w3c-test.org. Browser vendors regularly import tests from w3c into their own automatic testing system. Even better than having tests, is having tests that are run all the time for regression testing ;-) However, backend has to be PHP, and frontend has to use testharness.js. If the license allows it, I guess one of the hack-sessions on Test The Web Forward in Paris ( http://testthewebforward.org/paris-2012.html ) could be to port CSP-tests to testharness.js. -- Odin Hørthe Omdal (Velmont/odinho) · Core, Opera Software, http://opera.com
Received on Thursday, 13 September 2012 20:46:13 UTC