- From: Ingo Chao <ichaocssd@googlemail.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:41:21 +0100
- To: Dan Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Mike West <mkwst@google.com>, "Eduardo' Vela" <evn@google.com>, public-webappsec@w3.org
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Dan Veditz <dveditz@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 10/25/12 12:24 AM, Ingo Chao wrote: >> >> Without the violation report for extensions/addons, monitoring loses >> the chance to highlight risks coming from injected scripts. > > > You mean you, as a site author, want to be informed when an extension has > injected content whether the extension wants to be identified or not? That's > the exact opposite of what Fred Andrews was requesting. > > -Dan Veditz Yes. I am more concerned about the impact on privacy that an add-on may create. Ingo
Received on Monday, 29 October 2012 08:41:48 UTC