On 5/31/12 10:00 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Eric Rescorla<ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: >> The chairs would like to propose the following resolution of the sandbox >> directive: >> >> - CSP 1.0 will include the sandbox directive. >> - The sandbox directive will be marked as an "optional" feature in CSP 1.0 >> so that an implementation can conform without implementing it >> (i.e., it will be exempt from the requirements of S 2.) >> >> Is this something people can live with? > That's fine with me. > > Adam > Fine with me too.Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 19:31:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:54:28 UTC