Re: Transition Request: Content Security Policy to FPWD

On 2011-11-29, at 14:15 +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:

> Thanks and congratulations, Brad, EKR, Brandon, Adam.  Short name and transition approved.
> 
> Before we publish this, the status section should have a few brief words that are non-boilerplate.  In this case, it may be useful to point out that the spec is unusually mature for an FPWD, and that experimental implementations already exist.

Also, perhaps worth pointing out that the websec WG's requirements draft is relevant to this document.

> Once that text is in the draft, I'll proceed with a publication request; let's aim at this Thursday as the publication date.
> 
> Thanks much,
> --
> Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2011-11-29, at 01:07 +0100, Hill, Brad wrote:
> 
>> Thomas,
>>  
>> On behalf of the Web Application Security WG we request that the Content Security Policy specification transition to First Public Working Draft in the following location:
>>  
>> Content Security Policy (CSP)
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-CSP-20111128/
>>  
>> This can be published effective immediately (Nov 28). 
>>  
>> The abstract and scope may be found in the document itself, currently at: 
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/content-security-policy/raw-file/fa99d551900f/csp-specification.dev.html
>>  
>> The WG has documented its agreement to advance this document by issuing a Call for Consensus, (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webappsec/2011Nov/0014.html), resolved issues raised thereby, and agreed to proceed during our call on Nov 22. (http://www.w3.org/2011/11/22-webappsec-minutes.html)  
>>  
>> Thank you,
>>  
>> Brad Hill
>>  
> 

Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 13:16:23 UTC