+1 On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:22 AM Alastair Campbell <acampbell@nomensa.com> wrote: > Hi Katie, Leonie, > > I have to admit my first reaction to obsoleting 5.0 was surprise, however, > I think it will help with a common misconception. > > People outside the W3C tend to assume things are standardised then > implemented, whereas (and please forgive the simplification) the reality is > more a case of standardising once things are implemented. > > Marking the latest HTML spec as the ‘one to look at’ (by marking all > previous ones as not) is a better reflection of reality, so I think there > is a good reason to obsolete the 5.0 version. Therefore, I support the > change. > > Cheers, > > -Alastair > > -- Cheers, David MacDonald *Can**Adapt* *Solutions Inc.* Tel: 613.235.4902 LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidmacdonald100> twitter.com/davidmacd GitHub <https://github.com/DavidMacDonald> www.Can-Adapt.com <http://www.can-adapt.com/> * Adapting the web to all users* * Including those with disabilities* If you are not the intended recipient, please review our privacy policy <http://www.davidmacd.com/disclaimer.html>
Received on Friday, 21 July 2017 12:56:14 UTC