Re: Update on Push API

Peter,

When you get a moment could you complete the questionnaire for the 
security and privacy wide review [1]? Thanks.

Léonie
-- 
@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem

On 21/04/2017 01:21, Peter Beverloo wrote:
> Thank you Léonie, I will send an update when it's been settled.
>
> Creating a comprehensive test suite will be tricky because a lot of the
> API's functionality is dependent on behaviour provided by the user agent
> and the push service. I have filed an issue against WPT so that we can
> at least track this.
>
> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/issues/5630
>
> If we scope your question down to what's defined in the Push API, and
> not its dependencies, the core parts of the API have good
> interoperability between the implementations in Chrome and Firefox. I
> suppose we'll have to assess this more thoroughly when the specification
> reaches CR?
>
> Thanks,
> Peter
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk
> <mailto:tink@tink.uk>> wrote:
>
>     On 18/04/2017 18:09, Peter Beverloo wrote:
>
>         There are two more issues (209 and 235) that we'd like to
>         address for
>         v1, for which I'll put up a PR on Thusday. Following that we'd
>         like to
>         conclude v1 and request wider review.
>
>
>     Thanks Peter, that sounds good. When the PR lands I'll get the WD
>     updated and send it out for wide review.
>
>     What's the status of tests and/or interop for each feature?
>
>
>
>
>
>     Léonie
>
>     --
>     @LeonieWatson tink.uk <http://tink.uk> Carpe diem
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 3 May 2017 14:33:46 UTC