Re: Update on IndexedDB-2

I landed a minimal update to accommodate #170 - but we're expecting further
changes on the HTML side to StructuredSerialize that will require more
updates to IndexedDB, induced by integrating WASM into the platform -
SharedArrayBuffers (see also #152) and WebAssembly.Modules have
requirements that expose differences in behavior between simply passing
data between contexts and storing it. Reconciling the WHATWG and W3C
versions of HTML here is tracked as
- but again there's likely to be more churn.

Other than that... now is as good a time as any to take another snapshot of
the IndexedDB-2 ED and get reviews by a wider audience.

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 5:35 AM, Léonie Watson <> wrote:

> Josh & Ali,
> Could you post an update on IndexedDB-2? It looks as though #170 is the
> only issue holding up the move to CR?
> Léonie
> [1]
> --
> @LeonieWatson Carpe diem

Received on Thursday, 13 April 2017 18:28:58 UTC