- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:24:36 -0700
- To: "/#!/JoePea" <trusktr@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 11:12 AM, /#!/JoePea <trusktr@gmail.com> wrote: > I personally don't like this limitation. I think Custom Elements would > be better if we could create elements that have <any> <name> <that> > <we> <want>, with the possible exception that we can't override the > native elements. This would prevent us from ever adding any new elements to the language, or at least require us to do real-world usage checks and avoid names that would break too many pages if we took it over. Requiring a dash is a minimal cost to element authors, and permanently avoids any clashes. This is similar to CSS requiring custom properties to start with a double-dash, like --foo. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 18:25:23 UTC