- From: Michael[tm] Smith <mike@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:32:07 +0900
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Jan Miksovsky <jan@component.kitchen>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2016 06:32:35 UTC
Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, 2016-04-05 07:10 +0200: > Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/CADnb78jvJ1kARtvXAkCda-xq18xzV56bDOcoVS8prbmiMs6OfA@mail.gmail.com> > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Jan Miksovsky <jan@component.kitchen> wrote: > > I have no idea how to settle this question. If everyone else is happy using WebEx, and someone else can set up the video call, I certainly don’t have a problem with that. (My only issue would be if the meeting was restricted to voice only.) > > Does WebEx even support video? It does > In any event, per > https://www.w3.org/2006/tools/wiki/InstallingWebEx this would require > Java, which is a major security risk, and it seems the fallback is > audio-only. FWIW, there is an Android client (including video support). That is what I use personally, though the only thing I use it for is it get the webex system to call me back to dial me in to the conference on audio. After I get that audio connection I then just shut down the client. > So it seems better to use Hangouts or some such. Yeah, if everybody can agree to that it may work out a lot better. But another option is to use a WebRTC service like https://appear.in/ which work well enough these days with up to 8 video connections going at once. —Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith https://people.w3.org/mike
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2016 06:32:35 UTC