No meeting in december Re: [web components] proposed meetings: 15 dec / 29 jan

OK, just to formally close the loop we will not have a meeting in December.

cheers

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 05:12:55 +0100, Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> wrote:

> Thank you, Ryosuke. I'm fine not to have a meeting in Dec.
>
> Let me add a link to GitHub issue(s) for each item:
>
>> 1. Clarify focus navigation
>
> I think the following two GitHub issues are good starting points to know
> the current status.
> https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/103
> https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/126
>
>> 2. Clarify selection behavior (at least make it interoperable to JS)
>
> https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/79
> I think this is the hardest issue for us.
>
>> 3. Decide on the style cascading order
>
> https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/316
> I think everyone can agree on Proposal 1, as I commented in the issue.
>
>> 4. style inheritance
>
> https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/314
> I've already closed this issue. Please feel free to re-open the issue to
> restart the discussion.
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 1:31 AM Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Nov 13, 2015, at 8:08 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>  
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com> wrote:
>> >> What outstanding problems are you thinking of?
>> >
>> > Again, not I, but Hayato Ito raised these. I just happen to agree. He
>> > emailed this list on November 2:
>> >
>> >
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2015OctDec/0149.html
>>
>> Of the four issues listed there:
>>
>> > On Nov 1, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Hayato Ito <hayato@chromium.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > 1. Clarify focus navigation
>> > > 2. Clarify selection behavior (at least make it interoperable to JS)
>> > > 3. Decide on the style cascading order
>> > > 4. style inheritance  
>> (https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/issues/314)
>>
>> I'd like to resolve 3 and 4 ASAP since we're pretty close.  I don't  
>> think
>> we necessarily need an in-person meeting to do that though.  If  
>> anything,
>> it's probably more helpful to have discussion over mailing lists so that
>> each person can spend as much time as needed to understand / come up  
>> with
>> examples and proposals.
>>
>> For 1, we had a rough consensus on how current focus model (in  
>> particular
>> focus ordering) should be changed to support shadow DOM during TPAC.
>> Namely, we would create a new tab index "scope" at both shadow roots as
>> well as slots, and follow the composed tree order for tab ordering.  I
>> think someone should document that first.
>>
>> I just started working on 2 but I probably won't have a time to come up
>> with a proposal until mid December.
>>
>>
>> So if you guys can't make it, I don't think we necessarily need a shadow
>> DOM meeting in December.
>>
>> - R. Niwa
>>
>>
>>


-- 
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
  chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2015 10:40:42 UTC