W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > July to September 2015

Re: PSA: publish WD of "WebIDL Level 1"

From: Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:56:22 -0700
Cc: Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-id: <7383F5B9-93B9-458A-B676-60659E8946E8@apple.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>

> On Sep 1, 2015, at 7:27 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa@apple.com> wrote:
>> I think you’re missing the point.  The point of these documentation is to know exactly what the patch author was looking at the time he wrote the patch.  If there was a typo in the spec, that’s an important information.
>> As for diff’ing what has changed, that’s exactly the use case.  In order to know what has changed, you need to know what the old spec was.  The living standard is a total nightmare as far as I’m concerned.
> I guess it depends on your workflow. In any event, does what Domenic
> suggests and has implemented for https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__streams.spec.whatwg.org_&d=BQIFaQ&c=eEvniauFctOgLOKGJOplqw&r=051zrPFUkWGMfGlKdhy9Uw&m=dmgoI6lEFOWkspvfnnlq-RxpY4jfiiozATV5kFegnFY&s=UcHS2fRzjPxSXuZZ0gQQs5xb3C-Ct3peVtowrZdxoUE&e= 
> address your concern?

Yes!  It totally does.

- R. Niwa
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2015 14:56:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:14:57 UTC