- From: <yves.konen@ysadi.be>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:00:22 +0200
- To: "MOHAN ARUN" <marun2@gmail.com>, "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi,
Sorry if I might be out of scope, I am quite new in this mailing list.
The clipboard is aimed to exchange any? data between any apps running on
your computer. It is not a browser stuff, it is an OS stuff that any app,
including a browser, may use. I would like to use it in such a way I could
programatically cut/paste any (even not usual mime types) data, not only
contenteditable items data.
Now the problem is that the way a browser uses the clipboard has a lot of
limitations due first to security reasons and secondly to the fact that no 2
UA implement it the same way... Today it is really hard, IMHO, to write
cut/paste code working on all UA in order to exchange data with the "outside
the browser" world. If it is to cut/paste data "inside my webapp" then I
would not use the clipboard...
I agree with the need to define a new clean Clipboard API like the example
given by Hallvord that all UA will follow.
And I would add to the example something like that :
items.add(any_mime_type, serialized_data);
The serialized data could be like the base64 data URI scheme :
items.addDataURI(base64_data_uri);
Yves
-----Message d'origine-----
From: MOHAN ARUN
Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 2:34 AM
To: WebApps WG
Subject: Re: [clipboard] document.execCommand and clipboard actions
Would implementors want to support (writing stuff to the clipboard)?
Actually, no - "The Simpsons already did it."
Lets not think about windows clipboard. Those are Windows.
We are browser.
I feel clipboard is something that contains copy of
contenteditable items of the same web page.
We seem to be forgetting our basics.
Thx,
MohanArun.com
@cintanotes2
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen
<hsteen@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> so I hit a bit of an issue: I've written some parts of the clipboard spec
> with the assumption that it will be invoked from a
> document.execCommand('copy'/'cut'/'paste') call (although 'paste' would
> require some extra permission work which no UA but IE has attempted so
> far).
>
> Meanwhile, the editing task force has gathered feedback on developing
> editor
> features from implementors and drawn the conclusion that the current
> "stuff"
> including contentEditable=true and document.execCommand() is
> unsalvageable.
> So their aim is to deprecate and remove execCommand(). If it were to be
> removed, I obviously can't expect it to be used for clipboard actions. On
> the other hand, my expectation that I can build stuff on top of
> execCommand() makes life more complicated for them when they aim to
> deprecate it.. Some discussion ensues:
>
> https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/61
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-editing-tf/2015Aug/0001.html
>
> I'm not sure how to proceed. Now, "the old stuff isn't good enough, let's
> have a clean slate and do new and shiny things" is an approach that hasn't
> worked very well so far when writing specs for the web. This time might of
> course be different. (Personally I doubt it though. I'm not even sure if
> they developers who told them "the old stuff is something we don't want to
> touch, let's forget about contentEditable=true" had given this enough
> thought..)
>
> It's also true that the current approach in the clipboard spec -
> especially
> for writing stuff to the clipboard - is a bit hackish. Perhaps I (unlike
> the
> Editing task force) have been *too* deferential to the existing
> implementations, including stuff like onbefore* events that no browser so
> far did a good job implementing. (Nope, not even IE although it was
> invented
> there). I can see why Johannes Wilm suggests making a new API instead..
>
> If we came up with a completely new "write to clipboard" API - for example
> something like
>
> if(window.clipboard){
> var items = new DataTransferItems(); // ignore that we can't currently
> construct this..
> items.add('text/plain', 'Hello world');
> items.add('text/html', '<p>Hello world</p>');
> items.imageFromElement('image/jpeg', document.images[0]);
> window.clipboard.write(items).then(function(){
> alert('Copied all parts to clipboard!');
> });
> }
>
> Would implementors want to support that?
> - Hallvord
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2015 16:29:20 UTC