- From: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:36:56 +0000
- To: Domenic Denicola <d@domenic.me>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
I have a related question: what happens if the constructor throws? Example: <!DOCTYPE html> <script> "use strict"; window.throwingMode = true; class XFoo extends HTMLElement { constructor() { if (window.throwingMode) { throw new Error("uh-oh!"); } } } document.registerElement("x-foo", XFoo); </script> <x-foo></x-foo> <script> "use strict"; // What does the DOM tree look like here? Is an x-foo present in some form? // HTMLUnknownElement maybe? Just removed from existence? // This will presumably throw: document.body.innerHTML = "<x-foo></x-foo>"; // But will it wipe out body first? // What about document.body.innerHTML = "[512 KiB of normal HTML] <x-foo></x-foo>"; // ? does the HTML make it in, or does the operation fail atomically, or something else? // Now let's try something weirder. // Assume <x-bar> / XBar is a well-behaved custom element. window.throwingMode = false; const el = document.createElement("div"); el.innerHTML = "<p>a</p><x-bar></x-bar><x-foo>b</x-foo><p>b</p><x-bar></x-bar>"; window.throwingMode = true; el.cloneNode(true); // this will throw, presumably... // ... but does the XBar constructor run or not? // ... if so, how many times? </script> > -----Original Message----- > From: Domenic Denicola [mailto:d@domenic.me] > Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2015 20:45 > To: public-webapps > Subject: The key custom elements question: custom constructors? > > Hi all, > > Ahead of next week's F2F, I'm trying to pull together some clarifying and > stage-setting materials, proposals, lists of open issues, etc. In the end, they > all get blocked on one key question: > > **Is it OK to run author code during parsing/cloning/editing/printing (in > Gecko)/etc.?** > > If we allow custom elements to have custom constructors, then those must > run in order to create properly-allocated instances of those elements; there > is simply no other way to create those objects. You can shuffle the timing > around a bit: e.g., while cloning a tree, you could either run the constructors > at the normal times, or try to do something like almost-synchronous > constructors [1] where you run them after constructing a skeleton of the > cloned tree, but before inserting them into the tree. But the fact remains > that if custom elements have custom constructors, those custom > constructors must run in the middle of all those operations. > > We've danced around this question many times. But I think we need a clear > answer from the various implementers involved before we can continue. In > particular, I'm not interested in whether the implementers think it's > technically feasible. I'd like to know whether they think it's something we > should standardize. > > I'm hoping we can settle this on-list over the next day or two so that we all > come to the meeting with a clear starting point. Thanks very much, and > looking forward to your replies, > > -Domenic > > [1]: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- > webapps/2014JanMar/0098.html
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2015 20:37:26 UTC