Re: HTML imports in Firefox

Ashley Gullen wrote:
> On 15 December 2014 at 19:09, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu 
> <mailto:bzbarsky@mit.edu>> wrote:
>
>
>     But more to the point, we're not shipping imports because we've
>     gotten feedback from a number of people that imports are not
>     solving the problems they actually need solved.  We'd prefer to
>     not ship imports and then need to ship yet another HTML import
>     system that solves those problems.
>
>
> Well, imports work better for us than Javascript modules, for the 
> reasons I gave. I hadn't given any feedback because everything looked 
> great with HTML imports and I was simply waiting for it to arrive in 
> browsers. Maybe the process biases feedback towards the negative?

No, rather a Chrome-only writte-in-C++  "specification by 
implementation" is, however nice you find it, underspecified.

> I guess you never hear the chorus of "cool, can't wait!" from everyone 
> looking forwards to it?

Let's work through interop issues with the polyfill, first, please.

/be

Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 23:42:40 UTC