- From: Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:41:30 -0800
- To: Ashley Gullen <ashley@scirra.com>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
Ashley Gullen wrote: > On 15 December 2014 at 19:09, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu > <mailto:bzbarsky@mit.edu>> wrote: > > > But more to the point, we're not shipping imports because we've > gotten feedback from a number of people that imports are not > solving the problems they actually need solved. We'd prefer to > not ship imports and then need to ship yet another HTML import > system that solves those problems. > > > Well, imports work better for us than Javascript modules, for the > reasons I gave. I hadn't given any feedback because everything looked > great with HTML imports and I was simply waiting for it to arrive in > browsers. Maybe the process biases feedback towards the negative? No, rather a Chrome-only writte-in-C++ "specification by implementation" is, however nice you find it, underspecified. > I guess you never hear the chorus of "cool, can't wait!" from everyone > looking forwards to it? Let's work through interop issues with the polyfill, first, please. /be
Received on Monday, 15 December 2014 23:42:40 UTC