- From: <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 03:05:39 +0300
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
You don't need permission to publish a revised working draft - the workmode is "do it and see if anyone screams". So I announced we would. Now we just have to put together something that passes pubrules, or figure out what to do if there are issues. Tomorrow I am taking a day off (hence writing this after bed time) to do urgent stuff for my employer, and then I am flying to Australia where I spend Monday-Wednesday in all-day face to face before flying to Moscow. So I won't really be around until the CfC for the new process is announced. I can make a request for publication if you have a draft that you think meets pubrules. If you want me to actually work on such a draft, I can take the content off the tag github and do so - at best it will happen on the weekend, more likely the next weekend. If there are *substantive* differences between the whatwg and "other" version, which one do you want to fall back to? I prefer the "other" one because it looks more complete to me, but frankly I don't care whether you choose one, the other, or to make spot decisions - this is a Working Draft. But I will have to reply to Domenic's question. cheers 02.12.2014, 18:28, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>: > On 12/02/2014 09:23 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote: >> TL;DR: The administrative hold-ups are now all my fault, so I'm sorry if they persist, and I will start working to remove them... > > Thanks in advance for helping clear administrative obstacles! >> (other stuff later) >> >> 02.12.2014, 15:57, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>: >>> What is the hold-up for publishing a Public Working Draft? >> It has been that the chairs have been pretty busy, and we dropped the ball between us. More recently, we sorted that out so the hold up is now me. > > For discussion purposes: > > https://rawgit.com/w3ctag/url/develop/url.html >>> Can I ask that you respond to the following email? >> Yes. That's a very fair request. I may be able to do so tonight… >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014OctDec/0315.html >>> >>> Let me know what I need to do. >>>> Webapps still generally works under the 2005 version of the Process - >>>> but we could change this document to the 2014 process. The only >>>> really noticeable difference will be that there is formally no "Last >>>> Call", and the final Patent Exclusion opportunity is instead for the >>>> draft published as Candidate Recommendation. (In other words, you >>>> need to be pretty bureaucratically-minded to notice a difference). >>> Lets update to 2014 now. Its only a matter of time before not updating >>> won't be an option any more. >> Works for me. I'll start a Call for Consensus - but I imagine it will be a formality. >> >> Cheers >> >> Chaals >> >> -- >> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex >> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com > > - Sam Ruby -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 00:06:12 UTC