Re: URL Spec WorkMode

You don't need permission to publish a revised working draft - the workmode is "do it and see if anyone screams".

So I announced we would. Now we just have to put together something that passes pubrules, or figure out what to do if there are issues.

Tomorrow I am taking a day off (hence writing this after bed time) to do urgent stuff for my employer, and then I am flying to Australia where I spend Monday-Wednesday in all-day face to face before flying to Moscow. So I won't really be around until the CfC for the new process is announced. I can make a request for publication if you have a draft that you think meets pubrules. If you want me to actually work on such a draft, I can take the content off the tag github and do so - at best it will happen on the weekend, more likely the next weekend.

If there are *substantive* differences between the whatwg and "other" version, which one do you want to fall back to? I prefer the "other" one because it looks more complete to me, but frankly I don't care whether you choose one, the other, or to make spot decisions - this is a Working Draft. But I will have to reply to Domenic's question.

cheers

02.12.2014, 18:28, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>:
> On 12/02/2014 09:23 AM, chaals@yandex-team.ru wrote:
>>  TL;DR: The administrative hold-ups are now all my fault, so I'm sorry if they persist, and I will start working to remove them...
>
> Thanks in advance for helping clear administrative obstacles!
>>  (other stuff later)
>>
>>  02.12.2014, 15:57, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>:
>>>  What is the hold-up for publishing a Public Working Draft?
>>  It has been that the chairs have been pretty busy, and we dropped the ball between us. More recently, we sorted that out so the hold up is now me.
>
> For discussion purposes:
>
> https://rawgit.com/w3ctag/url/develop/url.html
>>>    Can I ask that you respond to the following email?
>>  Yes. That's a very fair request. I may be able to do so tonight…
>>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014OctDec/0315.html
>>>
>>>  Let me know what I need to do.
>>>>    Webapps still generally works under the 2005 version of the Process -
>>>>    but we could change this document to the 2014 process. The only
>>>>    really noticeable difference will be that there is formally no "Last
>>>>    Call", and the final Patent Exclusion opportunity is instead for the
>>>>    draft published as Candidate Recommendation. (In other words, you
>>>>    need to be pretty bureaucratically-minded to notice a difference).
>>>  Lets update to 2014 now.  Its only a matter of time before not updating
>>>  won't be an option any more.
>>  Works for me. I'll start a Call for Consensus - but I imagine it will be a formality.
>>
>>  Cheers
>>
>>  Chaals
>>
>>  --
>>  Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
>>  chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
>
> - Sam Ruby

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2014 00:06:12 UTC